<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laserlike Focus In A Thunderstorm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anexperimentinscotch.com/2008/07/laserlike-focus-in-a-thunderstorm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anexperimentinscotch.com/2008/07/laserlike-focus-in-a-thunderstorm/</link>
	<description>&#34;I write to discover what I believe.&#34; Michael Lopp on Twitter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Drinker</title>
		<link>http://www.anexperimentinscotch.com/2008/07/laserlike-focus-in-a-thunderstorm/comment-page-1/#comment-5756</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotch Drinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anexperimentinscotch.com/?p=441#comment-5756</guid>
		<description>I think your lightning strike is a better analogy than you carry it to.  When you get struck by lightning, you typically don&#039;t ignore it and in fact, you turn out to be pretty scrambled.  Interruptions while in a state of flow are exactly like that.  The stack of cards  you build up in your head regarding what you are working on tumble to the table and the productivity is gone.  

I don&#039;t think you have a choice to ignore interruptions.  The very fact that you have to take your concentration and apply it somewhere else, even if it&#039;s to decide whether you will allow yourself to be interrupted or not, results in broken concentration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your lightning strike is a better analogy than you carry it to.  When you get struck by lightning, you typically don’t ignore it and in fact, you turn out to be pretty scrambled.  Interruptions while in a state of flow are exactly like that.  The stack of cards  you build up in your head regarding what you are working on tumble to the table and the productivity is gone.  </p>
<p>I don’t think you have a choice to ignore interruptions.  The very fact that you have to take your concentration and apply it somewhere else, even if it’s to decide whether you will allow yourself to be interrupted or not, results in broken concentration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CharlesGary</title>
		<link>http://www.anexperimentinscotch.com/2008/07/laserlike-focus-in-a-thunderstorm/comment-page-1/#comment-5725</link>
		<dc:creator>CharlesGary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anexperimentinscotch.com/?p=441#comment-5725</guid>
		<description>A fine distintion, from a fine mind *smile*.  I wonder... perhaps the thing that most separates our points of view deals with target and choice.  

When there&#039;s a Thunderstorm around you, well, it&#039;s around everyone else too.  It is generally targeted at a region rather than a person (lightning-struck golfers aside.)  One can choose to acknowledge the Thunderstorm, admire its power and beauty, or not.  One&#039;s skills of concentration, God-given and/or learned, come into play, just as Scotch Drinker said.

But, when you&#039;re in flow (a usage that Scotch Drinker gave us last night) and someone taps you on the shoulder, well, that is no Thunderstorm.  It&#039;s a lightning-strike that you can choose to ignore or acknowledge.  I think most folk would acknowldege it, even if only to see if it a nerd or a hoochie mama.  And then you are out of flow...damage done.

Scotch Drinker is right.  These are two separate things.

I believe the real reason Scotch Drinker demurred was his first two choices of beer were not available, interrupted his Beer Flow, and that let the noise of pending Grass Mowing Need to intrude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fine distintion, from a fine mind *smile*.  I wonder… perhaps the thing that most separates our points of view deals with target and choice.  </p>
<p>When there’s a Thunderstorm around you, well, it’s around everyone else too.  It is generally targeted at a region rather than a person (lightning-struck golfers aside.)  One can choose to acknowledge the Thunderstorm, admire its power and beauty, or not.  One’s skills of concentration, God-given and/or learned, come into play, just as Scotch Drinker said.</p>
<p>But, when you’re in flow (a usage that Scotch Drinker gave us last night) and someone taps you on the shoulder, well, that is no Thunderstorm.  It’s a lightning-strike that you can choose to ignore or acknowledge.  I think most folk would acknowldege it, even if only to see if it a nerd or a hoochie mama.  And then you are out of flow…damage done.</p>
<p>Scotch Drinker is right.  These are two separate things.</p>
<p>I believe the real reason Scotch Drinker demurred was his first two choices of beer were not available, interrupted his Beer Flow, and that let the noise of pending Grass Mowing Need to intrude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

